Decision of Austrian High Court


22 July 2001
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Big News! Decision of Austrian High Court (Gaigg)..
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:42:01 -0500
From: Roy Beavers <>
Organization: EMF-L List
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

.............From EMF-L........

I think this is highly Leopoldine!!)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Decision of Austrian High Court
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:58:11 +0200
From: "Leopoldine Gaigg" <>
To: "roy beavers" <>

IGEF Internationale Gesellschaft für Elektrosmog-Forschung

(International company for electrosmog-research)

IGEF-expert won case against mobile communications company as per verdict of the High Court of Justice (Federal Court) of Austria.

Mr.  Wulf Dietrich Rose, expert in mobile communications, of Kitzbühel, Austria, internationally known for his research works in this field, won his court case for the third time against Max Mobil as per the verdict of the High Austrian Court of Justice (Federal Court) (Az 6 Ob 69/01t; verdict of 26 April 2001).

He proved through his studies and researches that mobile radiation represents serious health risks to the nearby living population like cancer, brain tumours, genetic problems, and disformity of newly borns.

In Germany, Austria and Switzerland, Mr. Rose, IGEF has affected several measurements and specific radiation studies and due to his expertise obtained that already constructed mobile stations in residential areas were dismantled or constructions were simply ostponed. Example: Max Mobil (a daughter company of German Telekom) could not increase the construction program of their intended network system.

The Austrian company Max Mobil filed a demand to the court requesting that Mr. Rose is not only charged to pay an indemnity fine for injurious malpractice but also prohibits him to publish his critical allegations in connection with the harmful dammages on health provoked by mobile radiation emissions. The Court of Second Instance came already to the conclusion that Max Mobile failed to contradict the allegations made by Mr. Rose that the radiations of mobile antennas are dangerous and noxious to the population.

This positive verdict by the High Court of Austria plus the repeated successes of cases looked after by Mr. Rose, proved that his researches and studies offer a solid legal base to request the transfer of already constructed mobile emission stations, or the postponement of same, out of residential areas in Germany, Austria, Switzerland or any other country, even if the indicated norms and guidelines are rigorously respected by the mobile communication companies.

Numerous studies prove that the electromagnetic fields of mobile communications, reduces the activity of the brain (including EEG), disrupts the sleep, changes the time of reaction, increases the possibility of brain haemorrhage, provokes lack of concentration , headaches, fatigue, nausea, loss of memory, reduction of sperm and melatonin, change of DNA, increases blood pressure, cellular perforation, risks of cancer, mainly brain tumour, and influences the good functioning of pace-makers. To continue installing this technology, which is already well known for its health risks, and against the resistance of already ill people, is not only criminal but a real "mafia mentality", comments Mr. Rose.

*          *          *          *          *

Very interesting too: The High Court of Austria cited the decision of the International Court for Human Rights in Strassburg in case of Dr. Hertel  1998 and said, national courts have to respect this decision for the future. That means, thanks Dr. Hertel and his fight  we are allowed to say and publish what we are thinking without fear to be punished.



Back to Top