Cellular Phone:
Cell Phones SARs
Posted:
7 April 2000
Cellular Phone:
Cell Phones SARs
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:20:14 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Roy L. Beavers" <rbeavers@llion.org>
To: emfguru <rbeavers@llion.org>
Subject: Re: Cell phones SARs (Microshield)..
........Forwarded by EMF-L.......
It is better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness
People are more important than profits!!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 12:57:49 EDT
From: MICROSHLD@aol.com
To: rbeavers@llion.org
Subject: Re: Cell phones SARs......
This is the latest and the most accurate SAR guide.
The Nokia 3210 has a rather high SAR.
SAR of 25 new cell-phone models:
================================
Manufacturer: Model:
SAR: (*)
------------- ------
---- ---
Motorola
Star Tac 130 (A) 0.10
+
Motorola
Star Tac 130 (B) 0.38
+
Nokia
8810
0.22 --
Sony
CMD-C1
0.55 --
Ericsson
I8888 World
0.60 +
Ericsson
S868
0.77 +
Nokia
6110
0.87 --
Ericsson
A1018s
0.88 +
Ericsson
SH888
0.90 +
Trium
Galaxy
(A) 0.93 ++
Trium
Galaxy
(B) 1.16 ++
Motorola
cd930
0.94 +
Panasonic
EB-G520
0.95 --
Alcatel
One Touch max (A) 0.97
-
Alcatel
One Touch max (B) 1.29
-
Ericsson
T18s
0.97 +
Nokia
6150
0.98 --
Panasonic
EB-GD70
0.99 --
Philips
Savy
1.11 -
Bosch
GSM 909
1.13 -
Nokia
3210
1.14 --
Motorola
cd920
1.17 +
Nokia
3110
1.24 --
Philips
Genie 1800 (A) 1.26
+
Philips
Genie 1800 (B) 1.41
+
Siemens
C25
1.33 --
Philips
Genie 900 (A)
1.52 +
Philips
Genie 900 (B)
2.67 +
Motorola
v3688
1.58 +
Bosch
GSM 908
1.59 -
SAR in W/kg
(A) = with extended antenna
(B) = antenna not extended
(*) = Warnings about possible radiation hazards
in the user manual:
-- = none
- = bad
+ = good
++ = very good